Prediction of Sandra Cacic vs Jean Ceniza Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Cacic vs J. Ceniza

Sandra Cacic

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.69m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

307

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Jean Ceniza

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.69m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

307

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Cacic 1 - 0 Ceniza

They have played 2 sets in total, with Sandra Cacic winning 2 and Jean Ceniza winning 0. The last match between Sandra Cacic and Jean Ceniza was at the ITF St Simons, 19-06-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sandra Cacic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cacic	1
Ceniza	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF St Simons(06-19-89)

Stats

Sandra Cacic

Jean Ceniza

S. Cacic vs J. Ceniza H2H Profile

S. Cacic	Stats	J. Ceniza
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.15% (170-169)	Career Total W/L	53.06% (26-23)
1	Clay	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Cacic vs J. Ceniza Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandra Cacic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jean Ceniza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandra Cacic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jean Ceniza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sandra Cacic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jean Ceniza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sandra Cacic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jean Ceniza winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sandra Cacic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 109/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/5). Jean Ceniza has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 21/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/7).
Player level: In the last year, Sandra Cacic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jean Ceniza has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sandra Cacic winning 1 times and Jean Ceniza being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sandra Cacic winning 2 and Jean Ceniza winning 0.
The last match between Sandra Cacic and Jean Ceniza was at the ITF St Simons, 19-06-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sandra Cacic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandra Cacic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jean Ceniza has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandra Cacic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jean Ceniza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandra Cacic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jean Ceniza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sandra Cacic vs Jean Ceniza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Cacic vs J. Ceniza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Cacic	Stats	J. Ceniza
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Cacic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells, California - 03-03-2003
R1 Alina JidkovaA. Jidkova	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Q3 Aniko KaprosA. Kapros	W	0-6 7-6(3) 3-1 ret.	Stats
Q1 Conchita Martinez-GranadosC. Martinez-Granados	W	5-7 6-2 6-2	Stats
Kroger St. Jude - Memphis, Tennessee - 17-02-2003
R2 Laura GranvilleL. Granville	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats
R1 Marissa GouldM. Gould	W	6-7(8) 6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Ceniza Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Diego - 01-08-1994
Q1 Susi Fortun LohrmannS. Fortun	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
ITF Elvas 25K - 06-06-1994
R4 Carole LucarelliC. Lucarelli	L	2-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
R3 Maja MuricM. Muric	W	4-6 6-0 6-1	Stats
Q2 Natalie FrawleyN. Frawley	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q3 Carla BazzonC. Bazzon	W	6-3 6-0	Stats

View All

S. Cacic vs J. Ceniza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Cacic	Stats	J. Ceniza
50.15% (170/169)	YTD Win/Loss	53.06% (26/23)
50.32% (388/383)	Sets Win/Loss	52.73% (58/52)
50.40% (3631/3574)	Games Win/Loss	52.48% (519/470)
54.77% (109/90)	Hard Win/Loss	56.76% (21/16)
40.91% (36/52)	Clay Win/Loss	41.67% (5/7)
51.61% (16/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
37.50% (3/5)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
360.44	Average Opponent Rank	440.16
15.38% (4/22)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (14/14)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
45.83% (22/26)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
60.29% (82/54)	Challenger W/L	53.13% (17/15)
46.15% (6/7)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
50% (167/334)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (26/48)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
48% (29/60)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	38% (3/8)
47% (46/97)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (7/13)
83% (175/145)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (28/23)
17% (175/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (28/5)
15% (163/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (21/3)